 
Gilles Sabrie for The New York Times
Zhang Hao, 9 months old, has been diagnosed with rhinitis, a condition that may be caused by air pollution. 
BEIJING — Weary of waiting for the authorities to alert residents to the
 city’s most pernicious air pollutant, citizen activists last May took 
matters here into their own hands: they bought their own $4,000 
air-quality monitor and posted its daily readings on the Internet.      
  
That began a chain reaction. Volunteers in Shanghai and Guangzhou 
purchased monitors in December, followed by citizens in Wenzhou, who are
 selling oranges to finance their device. Wenzhou donated $50 to 
volunteers in Wuhan, 140 miles inland. Officials have claimed for years 
that the air quality in fast-growing China is constantly improving. Beijing, for example, was said to have experienced a record 274 “blue sky” days in 2011, a statistic belied by the heavy smog smothering the city for much of the year.        
But faced with an Internet-led brush fire of criticism, the edifice of 
environmental propaganda is collapsing. The government recently reversed
 course and began to track the most pernicious measure of urban air 
pollution — particulates 2.5 microns in diameter or less, or PM 2.5. It 
decreed that about 30 major cities must begin monitoring the 
particulates this year, followed by about 80 more next year.        
The Ministry of Environmental Protection also promised to set health 
standards for such fine particulates “as soon as possible.” Last week, 
after years of concealing its data on such pollutants, Beijing began 
publishing hourly readings from one monitoring station.        
Ma Jun, director of the Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs,
 a Beijing nonprofit group, credits the Chinese public for the 
breakthroughs. “At the beginning of last year, we had almost lost hope 
that the PM 2.5 would be integrated into the standards,” Mr. Ma said. 
“But at the end of the day, the people spoke so loudly that they made 
their voice heard.”        
The fine particulates, caused by dust or emissions from vehicles, coal
 combustion, factories and construction sites, are among the most 
hazardous because they easily penetrate lungs and enter the bloodstream.
 Chronic exposure increases the risk of cardiovascular ailments, respiratory disease and lung cancer.
 The Chinese government has monitored exposure levels in 20 cities and 
14 other sites, reportedly for as long as five years, but has kept the 
data secret.        
It sought 18 months ago to silence the American Embassy in Beijing as 
well, arguing that American officials had insulted the Chinese 
government by posting readings from the PM 2.5 monitor atop the embassy on Twitter. A Foreign Ministry official warned that the embassy’s data
 could lead to “social consequences” in China and asked the embassy to 
restrict access to it. The embassy refused, and Chinese citizens now 
translate and disseminate the readings widely.        
While China has made gains on some other airborne toxins, the PM 2.5 
data is far from reassuring in a country that annually has hundreds of 
thousands of premature deaths related to air pollution. In an unreleased
 December report relying on government data, the World Bank said average
 annual PM 2.5 concentrations in northern Chinese cities exceeded 
American limits by five to six times as much, and two to four times as 
much in southern Chinese cities.        
Nine of 13 major cities failed more than half the time to meet even the 
initial annual mean target for developing countries set by the World 
Health Organization. Environmental advocates here expect China to adopt 
that target as its PM 2.5 standard.        
Wang Yuesi, the chief air-pollution scientist at the Institute of Atmospheric Physics
 of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, estimated this month that Beijing 
needed at least 20 years to reach that goal. 
The embassy’s monitor 
showed that fine particulate concentrations over the past two years averaged nearly three times that level,
 and 10 times the World Health Organization’s guideline, said Steven Q. 
Andrews, an environmental consultant based in Beijing.        
In fact,  Mr. Wang told Outlook Weekly,
 a magazine owned by China’s official news agency, Xinhua, that 
Beijing’s PM 2.5 concentrations have been increasing by 3 to 4 percent 
annually since 1998. He said the finer particulates absorbed more light,
 explaining why Beijing so often is enveloped in a haze thick enough to 
obscure even nearby buildings. Air pollution in the city and in nearby 
Tianjin is so severe that “something must be done to control it,” he 
wrote on his blog.        
Such sentiments are increasingly common on weibos, the Chinese version 
of microblogs like Twitter, especially among elites. International 
schools here are doming their athletic fields because pollution so often
 requires that students stay indoors.        
In November, Pan Shiyi, a Beijing real estate tycoon, asked his seven 
million microblog followers whether China should employ a stricter 
air-quality standard. Shi Yigong, a molecular biologist who left 
Princeton University in 2008 to lead Tsinghua University’s life sciences
 department, complained in a December blog post that air pollution was the single “most upsetting and painful thing” about life in China.        
Some Chinese citizens remain stoic or unaware. One afternoon last week 
when smog cloaked Beijing and the American Embassy monitor edged toward 
the top of the chart, parents flocked to the Capital Institute of 
Pediatrics, a children’s hospital in downtown Beijing, towing children 
with respiratory ailments.        
One mother of a 6-year-old awaiting treatment for her child’s chronic 
cough said: “I think it’s good for the child’s immune system to be 
exposed to tough weather like today’s. It will make them tougher.”      
  
 
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment