Click here to read the full article from Andrew Zolli at The New York Times
“None
of these is a permanent solution, and none roots out the underlying
problems they address. But each helps a vulnerable community contend
with the shocks that, especially at the margins of a society, can be
devastating. In lieu of master plans, these approaches offer diverse
tools and platforms that enable greater self-reliance, cooperation
and creativity before, during and after a crisis.
As
wise as this all may sound, a shift from sustainability to resilience
leaves many old-school environmentalists and social activists feeling
uneasy, as it smacks of adaptation, a word that is still taboo in
many quarters. If we adapt to unwanted change, the reasoning goes, we
give a pass to those responsible for putting us in this mess in the
first place, and we lose the moral authority to pressure them to
stop. Better, they argue, to mitigate the risk at the source.”
No comments:
Post a Comment